主语从句 + 外刊句式积累 • w00d1f

积累表达

Staling is to do with the chemistry of starch.

积累：A is to do with B. A 与 B 是有关的

= A is related to B.

= A affects B. A 影响了 B

e.g. Environmental pollution is to do with the poor management of emissions from factories.
It seemed that everyone took it as read that violent games increased aggression.

形式主语：it seemed that

形式宾语：took it as read that… it 指代 that 后的内容

积累：take sth. as read 把…视为毋庸置疑的
With climate-related tax credits and funding amounting to nearly $400 billion, the IRA is the most significant spending on this sector in US history and it is already influencing the path of US decarbonisation, which was accelerating even before the law was passed.

积累：amount to 总计

e.g. The cost of the repairs was 5000 Yuan. 可替换为 The cost of the repairs amounted to 5000 Yuan
The models’ latest projections range from a 43 to 48 percent emissions reduction compared with 2005 levels by 2035, a significant jump from the 25 to 31 percent reduction the models say would happen without the law.

积累：
1. range from A to B 范围从 A 到 B，用于表达（在一定幅度或范围内）变动、变化；延伸
  
  e.g. Students whose ages range from 13 to 20 show great enthusiasm towards this activity.
2. a significant jump （数量、价格或价值的）激增、暴涨
  
  e.g. A 51 percent jump in annual profits would help the company get out of trouble.
There’s general agreement that this is a big deal for the US.

积累：There’s general agreement that… 普遍同意… （通常后面跟要反驳的观点）

e.g. There’s general agreement that focusing only on studying in the long term could do no good for students’ physical and mental health.
Life gets substantially more difficult each year when we’re not making massive stride in decarbonization.

积累： make strides in 取得进步

e.g. For those who are making great strides in one subject, they would be more confident in dealing with difficulties in other ones.
This chimes with my experience in the UK.

积累： A chime with B. A 与 B 相一致（或相似）

chime v. 钟声敲响（i 发音 ai）
There is a view that this stigma motivates people to improve their health. But for those who experience it, the opposite can be the case.

积累： be the case 是这种情况

e.g. As for those who never do exercises in their prime time, lacking enough muscle strength to support a decent elderly life could be the case.
To change this, rather than making it all about weight loss, doctors can emphasize other positive changes, such as mobility improvements, to help healthcare become more weight-inclusive.

积累： rather than 而不是

Rather than A, I hold that B.

e.g. Rather than learning only compulsory courses in university, students are encouraged to take all sorts of elective ones to broaden their horizons in other fields.
The research only scratches the surface of what is going on in the rubbish piles.

积累：sth. only scratch the surface of what is going on in sth.
embrace the idea 支持这个观点

embrace 是及物动词
A taxing task 非常消耗的任务
amplify v. 使增强

e.g. Urban policy initiatives amplified social polarization. 城市政策的新举措加剧了社会的两极分化。
There is plenty of evidence showing that losing weight isn’t easy and that it is rarely sustained in the long term.

积累： There is plenty of evidence showing that + 句子

e.g. There is plenty of evidence showing that entertainment facilities could help heighten the sense of happiness among citizens.
And yet weight stigma, which describes the negative attitudes discrimination and harmful sterotypes directed towards people with larger bodies, is mainly predicted on this personal control narrative.

积累： be predicated on 取决于…；基于…

My idea is mainly predicated on the fact that + 句子。

I assert/hold/imply that 表观点

e.g. On the market reaction, the current gloomy outlook is predicated on reduced growth prospects.
- predict v. 预测、预计
  
  predicate n. 谓语 v. 断言（为真）、声称为真；基于、取决于
With so many different species present, the chances are high that…

积累： With sth., the chances are high that… 伴随着…的情况，有很大概率…

= It is possible that + 句子
Buoyed by an audience of billions, platforms yearning for new content, and vast reserves of cash, the creator economy has grown prodigiously fast.

积累： prodigiously （范围、规模、程度）巨大地、庞大地

e.g. Consuming a prodigiously large amount of fossil fuel, gasoline-powered vehicles have played a big role in polluting the environment.
For those still trying to get to grips with the idea that their children willingly spend hours following an ultra-rich teenager who bombards them with nothing more than promotional plugs for products, Lorenz offers the chance to better understand what drives the creator economy.

积累：get to grips with sth. 开始明白并着手处理某事

e.g. For parents who might find it hard to get to grips with the idea that their children tend to play video games with strangers instead of hanging out with their friends, there is information to help them dispel their doubt.
But trying to write a first draft of history is never easy, and it is made even harder by dint of the fact that the internet moves quickly and book publishing moves slowly.

积累：
1. Doing sth. is never easy, and it is made even harder by dint of the fact that + 句子. 做某事从来都不容易，并且会变得更难凭借这样的事实，事实是…
2. by dint of = by means of 凭借
  
  dint n. 凹陷、压痕 v. 使凹陷
e.g. Trying to stay focused on study is never easy for some students, and it is made even harder by dint of fact that there are so many factors that might distract their attention.

主语从句

思维转换

我今天踢了足球

英语思维：

我今天做的事情是踢了足球
今天发生的事情是我踢了足球

我觉得你的观点是对的

英语思维：

你所认为的事情是我认可的
认为你的观点是对的人是我

语法

主语本身是个句子，谓语用单数：主语从句 + 谓语（第三人称单数） + 宾语

That + 完整句子（主谓宾） + 谓语（第三人称单数） + 宾语

注意要将（That + 主谓宾）看成一个整体来发出谓语，而不是从句（主谓宾）中的主语发出后面的谓语

错误： That he played soccer today is happy. 他踢足球这件事是没法等同于“开心”的

正确： That he played soccer today makes me happy.

e.g. That I played soccer today is true.
what who how where when
1. what who 词性为 n. 做主语或宾语，是从句主体（主谓宾）的一部分
  
  (Who makes you happy) is also a great man. （who 作从句的主语）
  
  (What you do) is great. （what 作从句的宾语）
  
  (What is the greatest toy in the world) is XXX. （what 作从句的主语）
  
  注意要将括号中看成整体，判断是否能发出后面的谓语和宾语
2. how where when whether 词性为 adv. 做状语，因此后面要接完整的句子（主谓宾），形成从句
  
  How you play soccer has taught me a lot. （从句 How you play soccer 中 How 做状语，you play soccer 是完整主谓宾）
  
  Where you learned English is in Beijing.

Many feel that today’s increasing demand for oil and gas must prompt scientists to look for new, future energy sources. Others feel we should not search for new energy sources beecause searching causes too much damage to the environment.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

4 段（300 字）

主题段：背景句 + 双方观点 + 自己观点（60 字）
主体段：观点 1 + 理由（反方观点、让步观点）（110 字）
主体段：观点 2 + 理由（正方观点、支持观点）（110 字）
总结段：观点 1 + 观点 2 + 所以（50 字）

考场一定列题纲：目的是作文写到后期不会忘记主题是什么，防跑题

观点 1（正方）：

oil 破坏环境
资源有限，不够，需要再找
节约成本

观点 2（反方）：

搜索也会破坏环境，而且花钱多，不一定有结果

注意：不是所有句子都要长，肯定不能所有句子都短

It seemed that everyone took it as read that fossil fuels like oil and gas are the most crucial part of our society nowadays. Rather than holding that we must search for new energy sources in our planet, some people assert that with many possible damaging factors in terms of excavation process, the chances are high that finding new resources could adversely affect our environment. In this essay I will examine both of the ideas.

On one hand, in terms of finding new sources, some people’s idea is predicated on the fact that traditional energy sources could cause gigantic damage to our planet. There is plenty of evidence showing that the usage of fossil fuels could bring about a host of problems for our air, soil and waters on earth. In addition, what could be the case for our planet in the future is that traditional resources could be used up, making human beings unable to take advantage of their machines and devices. What’s more, embraced by countless people in the energy industry, their idea chimes with mine that new energy resources like electricity or solar energy could save consumers millions of dollars for its consumption, because of their various qualities.

Although we have made strides in pinpointing new sources in the last couple of decades, the excavation process has led to huge damage to our environment. For example, the refinement and purification of these new resources could cause far-reaching effects on various areas in our environment. And the utilization of some new resources like electricity has greatly to do with many batteries, which undoubtedly could leave permanent dents on our planet.

In conclusion, discovering new energy sources is never easy, and it is made even harder by dint of the fact that some new energy sources could cause adverse impacts on our environment. Because these two kinds of ideas only scratch the surface of what is going on in terms of energy industry, we actually should take a comprehensive and holistic approach to improve the employment and discovery of energy resources.

excavation n. 挖掘、勘探
pinpointing v. 准确找到
purification n. 提纯化
dent n. 凹痕、划痕、伤痕
In conclusion / To sum up
holistic adj. 整体的、全面的

练习

It seemed that everyone took it as read that oil and gas are main souce of energy. Also, there’s general agreement that fossil energy will bring about pollution in our environment. Although we have already made prodigiously strides in environment protection by scientific progress, we still need scientist to look for new energy source.

Some people won’t chime with this idea. Rather than finding some new energy souce to replace fossil one, they embrace the idea that we shouldn’t search for new energy, because searching itself is a taxing task, which will cause too much damage to the environment. They believe finding new energy only scratch the surface of what is going on protecting environment. Actually more damage via excavation or test could be the case.

I have a different aspect of view about searching new energy. With technology and science progress, the chances are high that we could use little damage to search or tap into massive new energy source, which could massively reduce pollution than fossil energy. Scientific methods will amplify the benefit of new energy using and searching only with little cost and can be easy to fix. There is also plenty of evidence showing that the fossil energy is limited, and many countries don’t have abundant fossil mineral deposit. We need to get to grips with solving real questions like pollution or damage to the environment in searching new energy source, rather than scared what will happen if we searching.

In conclusion, some people hold that searching new energy source could cause too much damage to our planet. I know making progress in new energy searching is never easy, and it is made even harder by dint of the fact that searching activities may cause damage and pollution. I assert we will gain more benefit than harm on searching new energy.

语法错误修改版

It seems that everyone takes it as read that oil and gas are the main sources of energy. Also, there is general agreement that fossil fuels will bring about pollution to our environment. Although we have already made prodigious strides in environmental protection through scientific progress, we still need scientists to look for new energy sources.

Some people do not chime with this idea. Rather than finding some new energy sources to replace fossil ones, they embrace the idea that we should not search for new energy, because searching itself is a taxing task, which will cause too much damage to the environment. They believe finding new energy only scratches the surface of what is going on in protecting the environment. Actually, more damage via excavation or testing could be the case.

I have a different point of view about searching for new energy. With the progress of technology and science, the chances are high that we could search for or tap into massive new energy sources with little damage, which could massively reduce pollution compared with fossil energy. Scientific methods will amplify the benefits of using and searching for new energy, only with little cost, and any damage can be easy to fix. There is also plenty of evidence showing that fossil energy is limited, and many countries do not have abundant fossil mineral deposits. We need to get to grips with solving real problems like pollution or damage to the environment while searching for new energy sources, rather than being scared of what will happen if we search.

In conclusion, some people hold that searching for new energy sources could cause too much damage to our planet. I know making progress in searching for new energy is never easy, and it is made even harder by dint of the fact that searching activities may cause damage and pollution. I assert that we will gain more benefits than harm from searching for new energy.

AI修改7分版

The increasing global demand for oil and gas has intensified the debate over whether scientists should prioritise the development of alternative energy sources. While some people argue that this search is essential for long-term sustainability, others believe that the process of exploration itself causes unacceptable damage to the environment. In my view, although the search for new energy carries certain environmental risks, these can be effectively managed, and the benefits far outweigh the drawbacks.

Those who support the pursuit of new energy sources emphasise the limited reserves of fossil fuels and the severe pollution they generate. Oil and gas are finite resources, and many countries already face shortages or heavy dependence on imports. Continuing to rely on them will only accelerate climate change and air pollution. Scientific research into renewables such as solar, wind and hydrogen has already demonstrated that cleaner alternatives can significantly reduce carbon emissions over time. With continuous technological progress, the long-term environmental gains from these new sources are substantial.

On the other hand, opponents contend that the search for alternative energy can itself harm the environment. Exploring and testing new technologies often involves large-scale excavation, mining of rare materials, or experimental facilities that disrupt ecosystems and contaminate water sources. They argue that such activities merely shift the environmental burden rather than solve the underlying problem. In their view, focusing on reducing current energy consumption and improving efficiency would be a less damaging approach than launching extensive new exploration projects.

Nevertheless, I believe the advantages of searching for new energy sources outweigh the potential risks. Modern scientific methods, combined with stricter environmental regulations, allow researchers to minimise ecological damage during the exploration phase. Moreover, any short-term harm caused by research is far smaller than the cumulative damage of continued fossil fuel use. Countries lacking sufficient oil and gas reserves particularly need viable alternatives to ensure energy security without further degrading the planet.

In conclusion, while the process of discovering new energy sources may involve some environmental costs, these can be controlled through careful planning and technology. Given the finite nature of fossil fuels and their serious long-term consequences, actively searching for cleaner alternatives remains both necessary and beneficial.